<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dallas Divorce Law Blog by Michelle O&#039;Neil &#187; Divorce</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.themayfirm.com/category/divorce/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com</link>
	<description>O&#039;Neil Attorneys:  Compassionate yet Relentless Representation in Family Law Matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 21:45:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Divorce, There&#8217;s an App for That!</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2010/05/15/divorce-theres-an-app-for-that/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2010/05/15/divorce-theres-an-app-for-that/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 21:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Tech Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce cost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorceapp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iphone]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Michelle May O'Neil of Dallas' divorce boutique firm O'Neil Anderson announces the release of Divorce Cost &#038; Prep -- the first in a planned line of divorce-related apps for the iPhone by her newly formed company DivorceApps.com. She and her business ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2010/05/15/divorce-theres-an-app-for-that/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Tender Years Doctrine in Texas.</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2010/03/31/the-tender-years-doctrine-in-texas/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2010/03/31/the-tender-years-doctrine-in-texas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 21:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Children and divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fathers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gender Differences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Men and custody]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mommy presumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tender years doctrine]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=391</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am often asked whether court&#8217;s still presume that custody of a child should go to the mother as opposed to the father. The short answer is no. Courts are not permitted to consider the gender of the parent (or the child) in making decisions regarding custody. Generally the best interests of the child are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2010/03/31/the-tender-years-doctrine-in-texas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal law controls state courts on income tax matters.</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/08/17/federal-law-controls-state-courts-on-income-tax-matters/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/08/17/federal-law-controls-state-courts-on-income-tax-matters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Division of Assets and Debts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Child Support]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[income tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[texas standard possession schedule]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a July 31, 2009 opinion by the Dallas Court of Appeals, it was confirmed that Federal law trumps Texas law when it comes to income tax issues.  In In re S.L.M., the mother brought child custody proceedings against father.  The district court appointed mother and father as joint managing conservators and awarded mother the right to claim the children as exemptions on her federal income tax return. On appeal, father contended the district court erred in awarding mother the right to claim the two children as tax exemptions.  In re S.L.M., ___ S.W.3d ___, No. 05-08-01277-CV, 2009 WL 2343264 (Tex. App. - Dallas July 31, 2009, no pet. h.).]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/08/17/federal-law-controls-state-courts-on-income-tax-matters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax time blues?</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/04/24/tax-time-blues/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/04/24/tax-time-blues/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2009 17:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Ashley</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effect of Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marriage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1040]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maiden name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[name change]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tax return]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=317</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, we survived another tax year.  Hopefully everyone got their returns in on time and the process was relatively painless.   For our readers who were recently divorced, its important to ensure the name on your tax return matches ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/04/24/tax-time-blues/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divorces Without Attorneys</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/04/22/divorces-without-attorneys/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/04/22/divorces-without-attorneys/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce rates]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A growing number of Tarrant County residents are choosing to see their divorces through without the aid of an attorney]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/04/22/divorces-without-attorneys/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Coarse and Offensive Language Provision Held Unenforceable by Contempt</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/02/23/coarse-and-offensive-language-provision-held-unenforceable-by-contempt/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/02/23/coarse-and-offensive-language-provision-held-unenforceable-by-contempt/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:11:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Appellate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Downloads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enforcement of divorce decrees]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=298</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Texas Supreme Court reversed a contempt finding in a Denton County divorce recently.  In In re Coppock, the parties entered into an agreed divorce decree that prohibited using coarse or offensive language in communicating with the opposing spouse.  This provision ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/02/23/coarse-and-offensive-language-provision-held-unenforceable-by-contempt/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Repealing Reimbursement Law</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/01/20/repealing-reimbursement-law/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/01/20/repealing-reimbursement-law/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Division of Assets and Debts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate and divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[repeal divorce laws]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The State Bar of Texas Family Law section plans to ask lawmakers to repeal a portion of the Texas Family Code ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/01/20/repealing-reimbursement-law/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divorce and Real Estate Market</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/01/12/divorce-and-real-estate-market/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/01/12/divorce-and-real-estate-market/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Effect of Economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Real Estate and divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Texas divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce and real estate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Divorce has become the most recent victim of plummeting home values, says the New York Times in its article Breaking Up Is Harder To Do After Housing Fall.  Nearly 20% of homes are now worth less ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/01/12/divorce-and-real-estate-market/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Can I Get That Kidney Back, You Cheater!</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/01/08/can-i-get-that-kidney-back-you-cheater/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/01/08/can-i-get-that-kidney-back-you-cheater/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adultery/Cheating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kidney divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It's all over the news today (here and here and here) about a New York surgeon who's getting a divorce from his wife and asking for the kidney back that he donated to her.  He gave her a kidney in 2001 and 18 months later, the husband claims, she's taking his kidney out with another man. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/01/08/can-i-get-that-kidney-back-you-cheater/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New Year Rings in More Divorces</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/01/06/new-year-rings-in-more-divorces/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/01/06/new-year-rings-in-more-divorces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 20:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dallas Texas divorce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[January is the top month for divorce according to a Scripps Howard News Service report.  Dallas and Collin county divorce lawyer Michelle May O'Neil reports the same trend locally that lawyers report nationally. Potential reasons behind the beginning-of-the-year rise ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/01/06/new-year-rings-in-more-divorces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

