<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Dallas Divorce Law Blog by Michelle O&#039;Neil &#187; Evidence</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.themayfirm.com/category/evidence/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com</link>
	<description>O&#039;Neil Attorneys:  Compassionate yet Relentless Representation in Family Law Matters</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 21:45:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Law Firm Sued Over Divorce Client&#8217;s Use of Spyware</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/07/19/law-firm-sued-over-divorce-clients-use-of-spyware/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/07/19/law-firm-sued-over-divorce-clients-use-of-spyware/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 22:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[evidence in divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spyware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wiretapping]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A law firm in Chattanooga, Tenn., has been sued for $2 million by a man who says one of its lawyers tried to use improperly intercepted e-mail in a divorce case.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/07/19/law-firm-sued-over-divorce-clients-use-of-spyware/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Legislative Session Going Strong</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/02/27/legislative-session-going-strong/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/02/27/legislative-session-going-strong/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Court Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jury trials in Texas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas Legislature]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Can you imagine being in the middle of a trial, presenting your evidence, when all of a sudden a juror raises his hand and asks a question?  [Lawyers shudder across the state... thinking how do you object to an inappropriate question by a juror!]   But, on the other hand, it would give insight to]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/02/27/legislative-session-going-strong/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Attorney Client Privilege</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/02/18/attorney-client-privilege/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/02/18/attorney-client-privilege/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Attorney client relationship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[attorney client privilege]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday I received an email from a client forwarding an email from her husband, where the email string from the husband included a conversation with *his* lawyer.  I'm sure the lawyer will not be happy ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/02/18/attorney-client-privilege/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>At least they didn&#8217;t target Dallas, or did they?</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/02/11/at-least-they-didnt-target-dallas-or-did-they/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/02/11/at-least-they-didnt-target-dallas-or-did-they/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 22:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adultery/Cheating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[adultery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas divorces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online affairs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Houston televisions stations had a boone of advertising during the superbowl from an online dating site for married people ashleymadison.com.  The CEO said in the Houston paper that it made financial sense because Houston and other Texas areas are a fast growing market for the company.  You can imagine ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2009/02/11/at-least-they-didnt-target-dallas-or-did-they/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My Ex Left Me This Voice Mail Message</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/11/25/my-ex-left-me-this-voice-mail-message/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/11/25/my-ex-left-me-this-voice-mail-message/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 14:35:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[High Tech Solutions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas divorce law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[preservation of evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recording telephone messages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Dallas Divorce client asked me a question last week:  My ex left me a really hateful voice mail message -- how can I preserve that voice mail message in case we need to use it in the future?

Here's an answer....  This telephone recording device ..........
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/11/25/my-ex-left-me-this-voice-mail-message/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divorce Process &#8211; Proving Separate Property</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/11/10/divorce-process-proving-separate-property/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/11/10/divorce-process-proving-separate-property/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 21:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Division of Assets and Debts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[separate property]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If a spouse wants to keep certain property after the divorce, it must be proven in Court that it should be considered separate property.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/11/10/divorce-process-proving-separate-property/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Divorce Procedure&#8230; The Discovery Process</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/10/30/divorce-procedure-the-discovery-process/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/10/30/divorce-procedure-the-discovery-process/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 18:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce discovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[divorce process]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Divorce Procedure&#8230; the Discovery Process  The next step in the divorce process is discovery. This procedure allows both sides to determine the size of the community estate and to learn the position the other party will take on certain issues. Discovery can be written or oral. Written Discovery During Divorce  Request for Disclosure: These are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/10/30/divorce-procedure-the-discovery-process/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Divorce Lawyers Note Trend in Internet and Spyware Evidence</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/09/26/dallas-divorce-lawyers-note-trend-in-internet-and-spyware-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/09/26/dallas-divorce-lawyers-note-trend-in-internet-and-spyware-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 19:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Adultery/Cheating]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dallas divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[invasion of email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[keystroke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spyware]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Married internet browsers beware:  information obtained from internet browser history and spyware is being used as evidence in divorce cases.  One survey shows 79% of divorce attorneys reported use of internet browser history as evidence, while 44% show increase in spyware use.  Many people use the internet to act anonymously, but in reality using the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/09/26/dallas-divorce-lawyers-note-trend-in-internet-and-spyware-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dallas Divorce Lawyers Note Increased Use in Electronic Evidence</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/09/25/dallas-divorce-lawyers-note-increased-use-in-electronic-evidence/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/09/25/dallas-divorce-lawyers-note-increased-use-in-electronic-evidence/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 13:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computer experts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hidden Assets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[electronic evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forensic computer expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GPS tracking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text messages]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=125</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A recent survey of nation-wide divorce lawyers confirms a local trend &#8212; electronic evidence is being used more widely in divorce litigation.  E-mail is the most prevalent form of electronic evidence being used, but text messages and GPS tracking are other forms that litigants are finding informative.  In Dallas area divorce litigation, there has been a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/09/25/dallas-divorce-lawyers-note-increased-use-in-electronic-evidence/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Religion in a Custody Case</title>
		<link>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/09/15/religion-in-a-custody-case/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/09/15/religion-in-a-custody-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 21:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michelle</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Divorce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal System]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[religion in custody]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.themayfirm.com/?p=67</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The New York Times ran an article on February 13, 2008, about the increasing controversy over religion in custody cases. See article here. Increasingly, people of different religions marry and divorce, then disagree over which religion(s) to introduce to the children. Or, tensions can emerge when one parent becomes more fundamentalist in their faith than [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.themayfirm.com/2008/09/15/religion-in-a-custody-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

